I happened to talk with him in 1988 before he decided not to run, and also in 1991 before he decided to run the following year. His calculation at both times was decidedly rational and entirely political, based on whether he could win."In other words, Clinton wouldn't run until he had the experience to be electable. The article goes on to describe a "what it" scenario. What if Clinton had run in 1988? It's a good read.
Also in Florida, he was taken aback when asked about the touchy issue of Everglades energy exploration. "Gosh, no one has told me that there's any major reserves in the Everglades, but maybe that's one of the things I need to learn while I'm down here," he said.Fred Thompson is one funny guy. Who cares if Hillary has the biggest mouth. Fred is much more entertaining.
But first, are you experienced?~~~Jimi
Uh-have you ever been experienced-uh?
Well, I have
Democratic race is much tighter, according to the latest NEWSWEEK Poll. Among all Iowa Democrats surveyed, Clinton enjoys a 6-point lead over her nearest rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. But among likely Democratic caucus-goers, she is locked in a three-way race with Obama and former North Carolina senator John Edwards, with Obama enjoying a slight edge.Obama gets 28 percent over Clinton's 24 and Edwards' 22 percent
“What I am opposed to is the attempt by potential hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty state, a drop in the medium income—to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone thorough the worst month since the Great Depression. That’s what I am opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war, a war based not on reason, but on passion, not on principle, but on politics.”
“I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undermined cost, with undetermined consequence of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequence. I know that an invasion of Iraq without clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than the best, impulses of the Arab world and strengthen the recruitment arm of al Qaeda.”
Banking on the youth vote may well be a risky endeavor. But targeting it in specific primary contests does make sense. While overall youth turnout for the Democrats in 2006 was disappointing, they are credited with helping hand over tight races like Jim Webb in Virginia and Jon Tester in Montana. David Broder wrote a column in Sunday's Washington Post about youth participation in government, emphasizing, as is typical, distrust and apathy. His final statement, however, hinted at what I think might make the difference for the Obama campaign: "young people respond when they are treated seriously." Most young people say they don't vote because they don't feel politicians care what they have to say anyway. Obama is taking the gamble of taking them seriously, letting them know how vital they are to his campaign. Admitting what to most looks like a weakness may actually deliver some extra strength at the ballot box.
Today,Sen. Barack Obama became the first Democratic presidential candidate to weigh in on the battle over a Planned Parenthood clinic in Aurora.FYI, Verizen reversed its ban on abortion messages.
Not surprisingly, the abortion rights supporter from Illinois said he would like to see the clinic open soon.
"I fully support Planned Parenthood's desire to open a new facility in Aurora," he said in a statement released this afternoon. "The proposed center will serve the growing population in a part of the state where access to a full range of reproductive health care services is lacking."
Judging from the audiences Obama draws in his appearances, Jochum said she was struck by the large number of young people who come to his events.
"He is inspiring them in a way I haven't seen since the days of Bobby Kennedy," Jochum told the Telegraph Herald.
Jochum said the Democrats' field of candidates is as good as any she has seen, but she waited to see how the various campaigns developed and how they matured as candidates before making a selection.
"My own personal bias is there is still a lot of political baggage left from her husband. If I saw her name (on the November ballot) I wouldn't vote for her. I think the general public who don't follow the issues but vote for the person are going to look at her entire history, which isn't too good, and she may pay for her husband's mistakes." Cheryl Klemmer, registered nurse, Oshkosh
"I'm more of a conspiracy theorist so I think the media is playing her up as the front-runner, and you'll see who really is the front-runner when people go to the polls. I don't think that America is ready for another Clinton in the White House to be honest. I don't think any of the candidates have been that impressive so far so I don't think there's any front-runner at this point." Mia Spooner, business analyst, Chicago
"I have mixed feelings on that. I think she has a lot of supporters out there, but there are a lot of people who would never want her in office. I think she could do a lot of good things, but I'm still on the edge whether to support her or not. I think people have a hard time with the idea of a powerful woman. There are a lot of Republicans who wouldn't want a woman in office." Jenny Gehn, student, Coloma
"She's not my No. 1 candidate. She's my No. 2 choice as I like Barack Obama better, but I tend to agree that Hillary will be the Democrat candidate and that she'll be a good choice. She has the experience of not only being first lady but as a senator too. I think she's a smart lady. I also think that most of the people will think she can do the job and vote for her." Bob Soldner, manager, Madison
"I think she probably would be, but I think Barack Obama and John Edwards are going to be very close. I think the baggage she brings with her is the universal health care coverage she proposed (when Bill Clinton was president) and I think Edwards has a better universal health care plan than Hillary, which could affect the outcome of the election." Nancy Wanek, nurse, Madison
"You either like her or you don't. There's no middle ground with Hillary, and that leaves the Republicans with some room to take her on. ... She's been waffling on Iraq ... but regardless of the status of the war in Iraq at the time of the elections, when people go into the booth they will be thinking of what candidate can best protect them against terrorism, and I think in that sense Hillary may be in a weak position unless she changes some minds." Gerald Boyle, vocational consultant, DeForest
"I think Hillary has too much baggage coming in to this to appeal to the whole nation. That doesn't say she wouldn't be the most electable because that depends on who the Republicans run. I think Hillary has too many negatives from her past related to health care, the scandals her husband was involved in, that will adversely affect the voters' opinions of her in the next election." Troy Meyer, economic support supervisor, Janesville
Mr. Obama’s aides said more than 20,000 people registered for the event through the campaign’s Web site. While it was impossible to determine even a reliable attendance estimate, view from the vantage point of an elevated lift seemed to reveal the gathering as one of the largest campaign events of the year.Not one of the largest, the largest. Right in Hillary's backyard.
"an educational foundation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. We do not lobby Congress, support candidates, or issue public policy statements on controversial issues. Our over 600 members include many of our nation's leaders from the fields of government, business, the media, religion, and the professions. Our members are united in their belief in a free enterprise system, a strong national defense, and support for traditional western values. They meet to share the best information available on national and world problems, know one another on a personal basis, and collaborate in achieving their shared goals."
The Heritage Foundation is committed to building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity and civil society flourish.The founder of the CNP, Tim LaHaye, co-authored the Left Behind series of books. The books deal with Christian dispensationalist End Times: pretribulation, premillennial, Christian eschatological viewpoint of the end of the world. It's not just that the Council is based on raeical conservative Christian beliefs. Check out the titles of the collection:
13. The Rising: Antichrist is Born: Before They Were Left Behind (ISBN 0-8423-6056-5) (All Libraries)Although these books promote the belief that the conservative Christian way of life is paramount in the fight to "save" the nation, the organization insists that they are
14. The Regime: Evil Advances: Before They Were Left Behind #2 (ISBN 1-4143-0576-1) (All Libraries)
15. The Rapture: In the Twinkling of an Eye: Countdown to Earth's Last Days #3 (ISBN 1-4143-0580-X)
1. Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth's Last Days (ISBN 0-8423-2912-9)
2. Tribulation Force: The Continuing Drama of Those Left Behind (ISBN 0-8423-2921-8)
3. Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist (ISBN 0-8423-2924-2)
4. Soul Harvest: The World Takes Sides (ISBN 0-8423-2925-0)
5. Apollyon: The Destroyer Is Unleashed (ISBN 0-8423-2926-9)
6. Assassins: Assignment: Jerusalem, Target: Antichrist (ISBN 0-8423-2927-7)
7. The Indwelling: The Beast Takes Possession (ISBN 0-8423-2929-3)
8. The Mark: The Beast Rules the World (ISBN 0-8423-3228-6)
9. Desecration: Antichrist Takes the Throne (ISBN 0-8423-3229-4)
10. The Remnant: On the Brink of Armageddon (ISBN 0-8423-3230-8)
11. Armageddon: The Cosmic Battle of the Ages (ISBN 0-8423-3236-7)
12. Glorious Appearing: The End of Days (ISBN 0-8423-3237-5)
16. Kingdom Come: The Final Victory (ISBN 0-8423-6061-1)
an educational foundation organized under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. They do not lobby Congress, support candidates, or issue public policy statements on controversial issues. Our over 600 members include many of our nation's leaders from the fields of government, business, the media, religion, and the professions. Our members are united in their belief in a free enterprise system, a strong national defense, and support for traditional western values. They meet to share the best information available on national and world problems, know one another on a personal basis, and collaborate in achieving their shared goals."In August, Bill Frist accepted the group's "Jefferson Award." Frist acknowledged the group’s power, telling attendees,
“The destiny of the nation is on the shoulders of the conservative movement.”With all these blockquotes to insert, I almost forgot why I looked into the CNP. Dick Cheney is paying them a visit. It's just his kind of get-together. Membership is strictly confidential and new members require unanimous consent from the other members in order to join. It sounds like a masonic lodge. They pick presidents? This will be interesting.
On September 26th, 2007 at 2:39 pm, memekiller said:
So nice to see such decorum return to the halls of Congress. The third war in the trilogy will be a bipartisan effort!
On September 26th, 2007 at 2:50 pm, Mark said:
History will record that the citizens of the nation looked on in goggle-eyed wonder as a self-centred little alcoholic Texas yahoo climbed into the drivers seat, cocked his elbow out the window and drove the United States to destruction.
On September 26th, 2007 at 3:04 pm, Zeitgeist said:
I tell ya, I just can’t figure out these unpredictable Dems.
Clinton, Schumer, Levin, Whitehouse (and others) had been routinely voting the correct way on these Middle East war issues; on this they did not.
Cantwell, Klobuchar and McCaskill had been voting wrong and suddenly vote correctly (good for them!)
Obama skips yet another key vote on these issues.
I’m confused.
Hillary Clinton's campaign team "killed" a negative magazine story by using an article on her husband as bait, it was claimed yesterday.
According to Politico newspaper, Clinton advisers told GQ that if the article was published they would withdraw co-operation over a piece on Bill Clinton, expected to feature on December's cover.
Jim Nelson, editor of GQ, said: "Yes, we did kill a Hillary piece. We kill pieces all the time for a variety of reasons."
The somewhat smaller lead may reflect a modest tightening of the race or it may be nothing more than statistical noise.Alvinia, aka Superhamster, ran away again. I left the top off the cage. She had to leap to get to the opening. I hope she comes back. She was getting beautiful and cute at the same time. Theodora is moping around, heartbroken again.
In the last week before the third quarter fundraising draws to a close, the presidential campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., is busy lowering expectations for their fundraising haul -- and raising expectations for those of her chief Democratic rival -- Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.ROTFLMAO. She's blaming her donors for being on vacation. That is special (interests.) Special interests are maxed out. She has no one else. This is our frontrunner? It's shameful.
An aide to Clinton's campaign tells ABC News that they expect to have raised between $17 and $20 million in the third quarter fundraising period between July 1 and Sept. 30, and suggested the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., will raise over $30 million, thanks in large part to online donations.
Blaming a vacationing donor base during the summer months of July and August, and suggesting previous donors have "maxed out" their contributions to the New York senator in the first two fundraising quarters, the Clinton campaign predicted Obama's campaign will beat them by over $10 million.
The poll also shows that while most likely New Hampshire Democratic primary voters have a preference, fully 55 percent have yet to make up their minds.
Clinton's lack of majority support within the SEIU shows discomfort with the prospect of her nomination among some of the Democratic Party's rank and file. She holds the edge in labor endorsements, but there are some doubts about whether she would get the SEIU's backing, say officials involved in the talks.
Clinton was at a disadvantage in appealing to Change to Win when her plane was grounded in Little Rock, Ark., on Tuesday. She addressed the crowd by phone, but several seats were empty.
Her speech didn't have the same effect as Edwards' and Obama's in-person appeals. She drew applause when she said UAW workers are "holding the line on the American dream."
September 19, 2007
Dear Colleague:
In July, we filed an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would place a temporary moratorium on the use of personality disorder discharges for those service members who have served in a combat zone. We urge you to join as a cosponsor of this important bipartisan measure.
On June 21st we wrote with 22 of our colleagues to Secretary Gates expressing our deep concern over continuing reports that personality disorder discharges have been implemented inappropriately and inconsistently. In mid-August, Dr. David Chu, Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness, responded to our offices without addressing two key requests in the original letter: that DOD conduct a thorough review of all policies related to the use of this discharge; and that the military establish an independent review board to address any questionable cases. Instead, this response suggests that the Department does not believe this issue requires further examination. Dr. Chu writes: "The Department is confident in the effectiveness of the current process."
We do not share Dr. Chu's confidence. Therefore we are seeking to halt this practice until Congress can be assured that adequate safeguards are in place. Our offices continue to receive and attempt to resolve questionable cases in which service members who appear to be suffering from combat-related psychological injuries are instead facing an administrative discharge for a personality disorder. We believe that even one case of an improper diagnosis and discharge for a personality disorder is too many. Over the last six years, Defense Department records indicate that over 22,500 personality disorder discharges have been processed -- an average of 10 service members discharged each day. We owe it to our fighting forces to ensure that air-tight procedures are in place to guide this serious and lasting diagnosis.
This amendment is offered as another step in our ongoing efforts to improve the quality of the Department of Defense's mental health services and care. This temporary moratorium is a commonsense safeguard to ensure a proper review and revision of current DOD policies. The amendment also gives the DOD flexibility by granting an exception to the moratorium in those cases in which a service member provides false or misleading information, or omits information about past criminal behavior during the recruitment or enlistment process. The moratorium would be lifted after the DOD reviews its current policies, ensures it is following standard clinical diagnostic practices, and establishes an independent review board to ensure that service members who have received this diagnosis may seek a review.
We hope you will join us in this worthy bipartisan effort. If you have any questions about this amendment, please contact Mark Linton in Senator Obama's office at 8-5553; or James Pitchford in Senator Bond's office at 4-6844. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Barack Obama
Christopher S. Bond
Barbara Boxer
Joseph I. Lieberman
Patty Murray
Claire McCaskill
John F. Kerry
Joseph R. Biden
Tim Johnson
Bernard Sanders
Far Atlantic disturbance 96L
I don't like the looks of this one. A tropical wave "96L" in the far eastern Atlantic, about 650 miles southwest of the Cape Verdes Islands, has gotten more organized during the past 24 hours, as seen in the latest Satellite imagery. The circulation associated with the wave is unusually large. The storm will be a little slow to get going, since the storm is so far south. At the storm's current latitude--6 degrees north of the Equator--it cannot leverage the earth's spin very much to help spin up the huge circulation it has. Despite it's close proximity to the Equator, low-level spiral bands have already formed, as seen in recent microwave satellite images (Figure 1). The wave is under about 10 knots of wind shear. The shear is forecast to remain below 10 knots through Wednesday, and there is some favorable anticyclonic outflow at high levels. There is a good chance 96L will become a hurricane late this week, as forecast by the SHIPS intensity model. The Lesser Antilles Islands should anticipate the possibility that this will be a hurricane by the time it reaches the islands seven days from now, although it could miss to the north. It is possible 96L will encounter a zone of high wind shear beginning four days from now. The HWRF model develops 96L into a 55-mph tropical storm by Tuesday, then weakens the system the remainder of the week. The GFDL model does not develop 96L at all.
Leaving Iraq quickly—“precipitate withdrawal” in the jargon of the Iraq Study Group—would create a humanitarian disaster and a terrorist safe haven, and set the stage not just for a more intense civil war but for a regional conflict that could destabilise much of the oil-rich Middle East. It would also raise questions—every where about American reliability and staying power. Rebalancing in this fashion would actually make a bad situation even worse.If the current situation in Iraq is not a humanitarian crisis, then I don't know what is. Here is a list of current notable members. I starting heaving after I read Dick Cheney's name. Politics sure does make strange bedfellows.
Obviously, we have a very difficult problem ahead in dealing with Iran, something that I think the Bush administration put on the back burner for too long, outsourced to the French, the British and the Germans, instead of, you know, going forward and seeing if there were any ways that we could rein in this regime and certainly prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons.I will be interested to see how Hillary's plan differs from the plan outline by Bush (9/14). WTF does "not outsourcing the problem" mean? WTF does "rein in" mean? Sounds like more cowboy talk to me.
And that's going to be my focus as a senator and as president.
The sanctions are aimed at getting Iran to suspend its enrichment of uranium. The international efforts to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been complicated by America’s conflict with Iran in Iraq, which Russia and some European countries argue should take a back seat to the nuclear issue.
My staff and I, we're looking at each other, we don't know what to do," he says on the stump. "But here's the thing after about a minute, I'm starting to feel kind of fired up. And I'm starting to feel like I'm ready to go.There is no more disciplined, motivated, aggressive, and focused campaign than that of Hillary Clinton, the commanding front runner of the race. Nevertheless, click on these videos and be prepared to be inspired.If you would care for another glass or two of Obama spirit, go to BarackTV. Will it translate into votes? Can he win without a strong media presence? Obama is pacing himself. He is in control, and he has the faith that can move mountains.
As Bush was describing his thinking about Iraq and the future, he indicated he wants to use his final 16 months to stabilize Iraq enough and redefine the U.S. mission there so that the next president, even a Democrat, would feel politically able to keep a smaller but long-term presence in the country. The broadcasters were not allowed to directly quote the president, but they were allowed to allude to his thinking and George Stephanopoulos of ABC News later cited the analogy of Dwight D. Eisenhower essentially adopting President Harry S. Truman's foreign policy despite the Republican general's 1952 campaign statements.The alt.money quote: broadcasters were not allowed to directly quote the president, but they were allowed to allude to his thinking.
"He had kind of a striking analogy," Stephanopoulos said of Bush on air a few hours after the lunch. "He believes that whoever replaces him, like General Eisenhower when he replaced Harry Truman, may criticize the president's policy during the campaign, but will likely continue much of it in office."
It is, in fact, a striking analogy, and of course Bush has been positioning himself as a latter-day Truman for a while, particularly in the sense that Truman was reviled by the public toward the end of his presidency but later earned the respect of history for his leadership at the beginning of the Cold War. Not surprisingly, Bush critics consider that wishful thinking.
Phase one will be paid for with a $400,000 grant from Homeland Security, but additional phases will cost more money.I never would have guessed.
--------
If a political machine does not allow the people free expression, then freedom-loving people lose their faith in the machinery under which their government functions (re: The Battle of Athens.) ~~~ Eleanor Roosevelt