Fitzgerald's personal friendship with No. 2 Department of Justice official James B. Comey Jr. -- he is the godfather of one of Comey's children -- leaves some critics complaining that top administration officials still have too much control over an investigation that is centered on the White House.
It was in the Manhattan office, pursuing mobsters and terrorists, that Fitzgerald and Comey became best friends, two of the "bomb boys," as the terrorism prosecutors were known around the office. They entertained colleagues with their endless comic banter -- "like 'The Brothers McMullen,' " said one movie-loving co-worker -- with Fitzie playing the straight man, except for the occasional acerbic aside.
David N. Kelley, the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, is another former "bomb boy"; he has known Fitzgerald for 15 years and has taken vacations with him. Kelley and others who are close to Fitzgerald stress that, while he is tough and aggressive, he is not unreasonable or overzealous.
the Senate sergeant-at-arms concluded in a 65-page report that two Republican staff aides had engaged in widespread, unauthorized and possibly illegal spying by reading Democratic strategy memorandums on a Senate computer system.Because of the seriousness of the issues, a bipartisan decision to bring in a special prosecutor, David N. Kelley, was made. I don't know how the case was resolved, but flash forward to 2005. In the middle of Plamegate, Deputy Attorney General James Comey "stepped down." Comey was
Over at least 18 months, the aides improperly read, downloaded and printed 4,670 files concerning Democratic tactics in opposing many of Mr. Bush's judicial nominees, the report said, and some of the material was leaked to conservative groups supporting the nominees and news media outlets.
The sergeant-at-arms suggested that the unauthorized spying could have violated laws against the receipt of stolen property and lying to investigators, among others. The report also suggested that many other Republican aides might have been involved in trafficking in the stolen documents, and Democrats have questioned whether officials at the Justice Department and the White House were also privy to the material in working to support Mr. Bush's nominees and derail Democratic opposition.
The two aides implicated in the affair have both left the Senate. One, Manuel C. Miranda, who had worked for both the Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, and Senator Orrin G. Hatch, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has defended his conduct in numerous interviews, saying he was able to access the computer memorandums because of Democratic negligence in securing them, not because of any theft or criminal wrongdoing.
the only official overseeing special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's leak investigation. With Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recused, department officials say they are still trying to resolve whom Fitzgerald will now report to.I don't know who Fitzgerald eventually reported to.
what had been routine requests from the Information Security Oversight Office of the National Archives about his handling of classified data.Cheney says that his office is not part of the Executive Branch. Dick Dick Dick. No funds for you! According to Raw Story, Rahm Emanuel will be introducing an Amendment in the House to cut funding to Cheney's office. Logical consequences. You gotta love it.
That's something Lumberton High School junior Josh Gipson said South Mississippi needs.It's a win-win situation. The mayor of Lumberton agrees.
The 17-year-old said he became concerned about global warming after seeing former Vice President Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth."
Gipson said he and a group of friends started trying to spread the word about the need to think environmentally.
"The White House has found many ways to keep sunlight from reaching some of the darker corners of the Bush Justice Department, but this is a new one," Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said in a statement. "With a confirmation hearing looming next Tuesday, they have withdrawn this nomination to avoid having to answer more questions under oath."Let's get real here. These attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. He has the answers.
"'Here's a guy who raises 'executive privilege' to historic levels to exempt himself from all rules and oversight, and now he says he's not part of the executive branch?' said Silverstein. 'Here we have a subordinate part of the executive branch asserting independent constitutional authority even against its own superior. It is flabbergasting.'"The VP neither confirms nor denies he tried to abolish the National Archives' Information Security Oversight Office. National security didn't mean anything to him when it came to outing a CIA officer. Doesn't anyone have oversight over this philistine?
Mr. Byrd and aides to Representative John Conyers Jr., the Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee and joined in seeking the study, said their next step would be to explore the signing statements to determine the broad extent of their impact. Mr. Byrd noted that another agency, the Congressional Research Service, had identified 700 provisions in law questioned by the administration.
“Moving forward, I plan to ask auditors to take a look at these provisions and determine what legal violations they find,” Mr. Byrd said. “Once we have the facts, we will be able to determine the next steps.”
Q Dana, is there a limit to the mailbox size with the RNC accounts? Do you know that level of detail, whether you'd have to delete at some point or you couldn't get any more emails?When did Rove start using the RNC mail server?
MS. PERINO: I don't know. I know that oftentimes our computers can slow down, but we have an automatic archiving system that comes through and cleans it up for us. And all of the emails, except for the ones -- the very small slice of the universe I've told you about that have the GWB accounts -- any email that touches any part of an EOP or White House server or computer, those are automaticallypreserved.
Fitzgerald was concerned that Rove had hidden or destroyed a very important document tying him to the leak. His suspicions may have been right: an email he sent to then Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley in early July 2003 later proved Rove had spoken to Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper about Plame-a fact that Rove omitted when he was first interviewed by the FBI.After that incident, Karl started the RNC server 95% of the time on taxpayer money. Was the server secure? Why was he so confident that the emails would never be recovered before and after the investigation?
The documents included a memorandum from then-White House General Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales, who is now attorney general, cautioning employees that "any e-mail relating to official business … qualifies as a presidential record."Who was keeping the backup tapes?
None would name the staffers and/or officials whom Rove is providing information about. They did, however, explain that the White House computer system has "real time backup" servers and that while emails were deleted from computers, they were still retrievable from the backup system. By providing the dates and recipient information of the deleted emails, sources say, Rove was able to chart a path for Fitzgerald directly into the office of the Vice President.Excuses, excuses, excuses. They're like backsides. They all stink.
Why didn't the Rove e-mail surface earlier? The lawyer says it's because an electronic search conducted by the White House missed it because the right "search words" weren't used. (The White House and Fitzgerald both declined to comment.)Then there is the question, who in God's creation is Rob Kelner? He's the lawyer who said no more deletions for you!
A lawyer for the RNC told congressional investigators that the RNC may be able to recover some of those e-mails sent from August 2004 on. That's when the RNC put a hold on an automatic purge policy.The article also mentions an automatic purge policy. Doesn't that take the cake?
A lawyer for the RNC told congressional investigators that the RNC may be able to recover some of those e-mails sent from August 2004 on. That's when the RNC put a hold on an automatic purge policy.Remember when? Check out the Cheney and Libby dispute. If Karl Rove was warned by the AG and the lawyer from the RNC shouldn't he have already figured out how to archive his correspondence?
According to several Pentagon sources close to Rove and others familiar with the inquiry, Bush's senior adviser tipped off Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to information that led to the recent "discovery" of 250 pages of missing email from the office of Vice President Dick Cheney.......What else did the "senior advisers" say to Fitzgerald? Inquiring minds want to know just who who these senior advisers were.
According to one source close to the case, Rove is providing information on deleted emails, erased hard drives and other types of obstruction by staff and other officials in the Vice President's office. Pentagon sources close to Rove confirmed this account.
He said he hadn't discussed the matter with anyone at the Justice Department but made it clear he had been kidded plenty.
The RNC lawyer, also said that the Republican committee has none of Rove's e-mails on its server prior to 2005, possibly because Rove deleted them, according to House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif.Did you know that is cost several million dollars to reconstruct the emails from the Clinton White House? Randall Sanborn (who is he?), Patrick Fitzgerald's spokesman, refused to comment on the half-ass investigatory skills of the US attorney and his staff. Come to think of it, it's pretty interesting that they used a US attorney to investigate the Plame affair. Fitzgerald has maintained that there was no evidence pertinent to the Plame case in the emails in question. Indeed. Wasn't there a violation of the Presidential Records Act?
Sometime in 2005, the RNC took action solely to prevent Rove from deleting his e-mails on that server. One reason for specifying Rove, Waxman said, appears to have been pending legal action against him.
A spokesman for Mr. Fitzgerald, Randall Samborn, also declined to comment. The letter does not indicate how thoroughly prosecutors explored the issue of the missing e-mails. However, Mr. Fitzgerald wrote that he did not believe any evidence disappeared that was relevant to the charges against Mr. Libby.Why wasn't Patrick Fitzgerald taken off the list?
US Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald was ranked among prosecutors who had "not distinguished themselves" on a Justice Department chart sent to the White House in March 2005, when he was in the midst of leading a CIA leak investigation that resulted in the perjury conviction of a vice presidential aide, administration officials said yesterday.Axed attorneys, Daniel Bogden (Nevada) and Paul K. Charlton (Arizona) received the same grade. As my students would say, "It isn't fair."
The ranking placed Fitzgerald below "strong US Attorneys . . . who exhibited loyalty" to the administration but above "weak US Attorneys who . . . chafed against Administration initiatives, etc.," according to Justice documents.
The committee said that it will seek to recover the lost records from federal agencies that were often the recipients of the e-mails, and will seek to expand the investigation into whether former White House Counsel and current Attorney General Alberto Gonzales [JURIST news archive] was aware of the use of RNC e-mail accounts by White House officials and if Gonzales took steps to preserve the RNC e-mail records pursuant to the PRA.
Let’s play a game this Tuesday. See if you can guess who/which organization offered this gem: “The rule of law, the very foundation for a free society, has been under assault, not only by criminals from the ground up, but also from the top down. An administration that lives by evasion, coverup, stonewalling, and duplicity has given us a totally discredited Department of Justice. The credibility of those who now manage the nation’s top law enforcement agency is tragically eroded. We are fortunate to have its dedicated career workforce, especially its criminal prosecutors, who have faced the unprecedented politicization of decisions regarding both personnel and investigations.”The Brad Blog puts the scandal in perspective.
Is the answer: 1) A Democratic loudmouth on the Senate Judiciary Committee? 2) A smarmy Democratic presidential candidate? 3) The relentless folks from moveon.org? 4) That guy on HBO who is less funny than he thinks he is? Nope. The correct answer is, surprise surprise, the 2000 Republican National Platform. That’s right. The platform upon which President George W. Bush first ran for and won the presidency contained precisely the sort of language that his most strident critics might be tempted to use today as the U.S. Attorney scandal swirls downward to a whole new level.
Over 140,000 emails from and to Karl Rove have been preserved. However, only 130 of these preserved were Rove’s emails from the first Bush term. Not 130,000. Just 130.I want to know when the emails disappeared. At the very least, I want to know exactly when the emails were discovered missing. I really want to know how there can be gaps in the emails that were saved. I want to know exactly when these email accounts were set up for the various staff members of the administration and what duties did these individuals perform for the RNC. Finally, I want to know who was in charge of archiving the documents. Geeze Louise, the public has been waiting patiently for these emails to be turned over for quite some time.
No wonder presidential records are an issue here. The years that gave us...
• Chandra Levy,
• Enron,
• September 11, 2001,
• The anthrax mailings,
• The assassination of Assistant US Attorney Thomas C. Wales, in Seattle,
• The attack on pitiful Afghanistan,
• The “hunt” for Osama bin Laden,
• The lead-up to war on Iraq,
• The DC sniper attacks of fall 2002, and
• The “capture” of Saddam Hussein
...are only fragmentarily preserved for Americans, as far as official historical record goes.
Now why would that be?
The change, say GOP operatives, is the absence of fear about being perceived as something less than an ardent Bush backer. "What's the penalty now, Karl being mad at you?" Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio asked with a laugh, referring to Bush political adviser Karl Rove. "Who cares? Even his former chief strategist (Matthew Dowd) walked away from him and pissed all over him."
This President has also used signing statements to challenge laws banning torture, on affirmative action and prohibiting the censorship of scientific data. In fact, time and again, this President has stood before the American people, signed laws enacted by their representatives in Congress, while all along crossing his fingers behind his back. And, while this President proudly boasts being the first modern President to have never vetoed a bill, he has cleverly used his signing statements as a de facto line-item veto to cherry-pick which laws he will enforce in a manner not contemplated by our Constitution.Bush was breaking the law a year ago and there was no investigation. This year, the Congress asked the GAO to investigate.
Under our constitutional system of government, when Congress passes a bill and the President signs it into law, that should be the end of the story. It is the law of the land unless and until repealed by Congress or invalidated by the courts. For this reason, there are grave and inherent dangers to the extensive and unprecedented use of signing statements.
When the President uses signing statements to unilaterally rewrite the laws enacted by the people’s representatives in Congress, he creates doubt about what the rule of law means in our Nation.
The limited GAO study examined signing statements concerning 19 provisions in fiscal year 2006 spending bills. It found that in six of those cases the provisions were not executed as written.Bush is laughing all the way to the bank. Speaking of banks, have you seen Inside Man, directed by Spike Lee?
In one case the Pentagon did not include separate budget justification documents explaining how the Iraq War funding was to be spent in its 2007 budget request. In another, the Federal Emergency Management Agency did not submit a proposal and spending plan for housing, as Congress directed.
believes the efforts began when one of Wal-Mart's chief executive officer's wives watched the Al Gore documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth.""It made such an impression on her, she turned around and got him to meet with one of our CEOs, and that's all it took," she said.
My search for the term ‘caging’ in the transcripts of the House Hearings, was not as easy as I thought it would be. Turns out that the term was not in the transcript. So I searched for the term, McNulty, and found Goodlings’ references to ‘caging.’ Only some editor had mis-spelled the term, ‘cadging,’ as if they didn’t know. Ever feel like someone does not want you to find something?
There's something happening, and you don't know what it is. Do you, Mr. Jones?"
$854 million in offers of foreign assistance from 151 countries following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the devastating failure of the federal levee system. According to the April 29 article, only $126.4 was accepted.
The greater concern for his constituents back home in Arizona should be whether Kyl’s backroom shenanigans are what we sent him to Washington to do.
Kyl’s commitment to being one of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ Capitol Hill waterboys is a scary situation indeed.
Gonzales is no friend of open government. As White House Counsel in the George W. Bush administration, he was an active defender of “quasi-executive privilege,” which has drastically broadened the President’s ability to hide his decision-making processes from the public and Congress.
Gonzales has also actively worked to block the release of many presidential papers from the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations despite federal law making many of those papers public 12 years after a president leaves office.
Here’s why Jon Kyl should care a lot more about what Arizona thinks and less about what Alberto Gonzales and the White House want.
The state Kyl represents was founded on populism — government by the people, of the people and for the people. We don’t trust Big Government and we don’t trust government in secret.
That is the legacy of service that this state has sent its congressional delegations to Washington with for 95 years. Jon Kyl should make his mind up now. Is he the Justice Department’s senator?
Or is he Arizona’s senator, deserving to walk in the footsteps of Barry Goldwater and Carl Hayden as a proper servant of the Grand Canyon State.
the close attention Congress and the press are paying to United States attorneys has prevented the White House from installing a “loyal Bushie,” in Mr. Sampson’s famous phrase.Close attention, indeed. Guess who was just appointed interim US attorney (and the first two guesses don't count.)
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists, the nation’s largest journalism-advocacy organization, used the power of the blogosphere to find out whose legislative bludgeon was buried in the back of open government. We called every senator, one by one, until at last — when it became clear he could hide no longer — Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), came blinking and grimacing into the sunlight and admitted that it was he who placed a secret hold ... on a bill that addresses secrecy in government."Secret holds." I never heard of them and now I'm wondering if there are more secret tricks. Secret tricks, dirty tricks, someone should write a book. Here's more on OPEN and may God bless the Society of Professional Journalists.
We would need only 10 million acres of land -- only four-tenths of one percent of the area of the United States -- to supply all of our nation's energy using PV.PV is short for photovoltaic, which means to convert the sun's energy into electricity. I don't expect too much from a state that promotes pool heaters to encourage the use of solar power. I have never seen a heated pool in South Florida except in hotels. If we don't get a move on, The Chinese will.
Florida officials on both sides of the aisle had been supportive of the state Legislature’s decision to defy the national parties and move up the date.Senator Nelson, with all due respect, aren't your fellow state Democrats and even the state Republicans in favor of changing the date of the primary? Just who in God's creation are you representing? It sure as hell isn't Florida.
“We recognize the (national) party’s need to control the primaries, but individual states need to do what best benefits their voters,” said Jim Greer, chairman of the Florida Republican Party, who acknowledged threats from the national GOP.
I believe the deputy was not fully candid about his knowledge of White House involvement in the replacement decision, failed to disclose that he had some knowledge of the White House's interest in selecting Tim Griffin as the interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Arkansas, inaccurately described the department's internal assessment of the Parsky commission, and failed to disclose that he had some knowledge of allegations that Tim Griffin had been involved in vote- cadging during his work on the president's 2004 campaign.Here's the new word that I learned today.
In a letter sent Thursday to Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, Klobuchar wrote she is concerned about a news report indicating Heffelfinger may have been targeted after his office raised concerns about a law that could have discriminated against American Indian voters.Rachel Paulose, the current US attorney for the district, had no comment. Ms. Paulose is a Katherine Harris wannabe.
The report, in Thursday's edition of the Los Angeles Times, indicates former Justice official Bradley Schlozman essentially prevented any investigation into Heffelfinger's concerns.
Schlozman is scheduled to testify before the committee Tuesday. In her letter, Klobuchar asked that Leahy question Schlozman about "his efforts to effectively quash the investigation into possible voter discrimination against Native Americans; and (ii) what role, if any, Tom Heffelfinger's efforts to protect the voting rights of Minnesota's Native American communities placed him on the Department's now infamous list for termination."
Rachel K. Paulose’s swearing in on March 9 as the United States attorney in Minneapolis stirred debate in local legal circles because of the ceremonial trappings, including a performance by a municipal choir and a Marine Corps color guard, at the event attended by more than 300 people at the city’s University of St. Thomas law school.If you recall, Rachel Paulose was one of the first US attorney replacements appointed during the purge. As a Yalie and a senior aide to Paul McNulty, she must have been at the top of the loyalty list. The first two or three replacements (the initial report that I read said that 11 attorneys were replaced) were appointed with Senate approval. I was right about the eleven. The other three (11-8) had already resigned:
Rachel K. Paulose has drawn criticism since her swearing-in ceremony last month as the United States attorney in Minneapolis.
But the complaints about Ms. Paulose’s investiture seem mild in comparison with the uproar ignited on Thursday, when three of her top deputies stepped down from their leadership positions. Several of their associates described the action as a protest over what the three deputies regarded as Ms. Paulose’s ideologically driven and dictatorial managerial style.
Tim Griffin, whose December appointment as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas sparked a national outcry about surreptitious changes made to a law affecting federal prosecutors, says he no longer wants the job permanently.He resigns today. Dan Bartlett is also resigning. His last day is July 4.
“I have made the decision not to let my name go forward to the Senate,” Griffin said Thursday evening.
--------
If a political machine does not allow the people free expression, then freedom-loving people lose their faith in the machinery under which their government functions (re: The Battle of Athens.) ~~~ Eleanor Roosevelt